Key Finding
Both regular and Han's style pediatric Tuina significantly improved all functional constipation outcomes in children, with Han's style producing superior results across stool consistency, frequency, difficulty, duration, and bloating measures.
Constipation is one of the most common digestive complaints in young children, and many parents are looking for gentle, drug-free options to help. A recent study published in the journal Medicine explored whether a traditional Chinese hands-on therapy called Tuina (also known as Chinese pediatric therapeutic massage) could safely and effectively relieve constipation in children as young as one year old.
Researchers enrolled 196 children between the ages of 1 and 7 who had been diagnosed with functional constipation — meaning no underlying medical cause was found — for at least three months. All children also fit a traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) pattern called "food stagnation with interior heat." The children were randomly divided into two groups: one received standard pediatric Tuina massage, and the other received a specialized variation called Han's style Tuina. Both groups completed two treatment sessions over roughly three weeks.
The results were encouraging. Children in both groups showed meaningful improvements in stool consistency, how often they went to the bathroom, how long they strained, how difficult it was to pass stools, and how much bloating they experienced. Even better, these improvements were still present one week after treatment ended. When comparing the two approaches, Han's style Tuina produced noticeably stronger results across all measures.
What does this mean for families? Tuina massage may offer a safe, non-invasive option for managing childhood constipation, particularly when parents prefer to avoid laxatives or medications. It is especially relevant for children whose symptoms align with the TCM diagnosis of food stagnation and interior heat.
If you are considering Tuina therapy for your child, seek out a licensed practitioner trained in pediatric TCM techniques to ensure safe and appropriate care.
This randomized single-blind trial (n = 196, ages 1–7, mean age 2.7 ± 1.5 years) compared regular pediatric Tuina to Han's style pediatric Tuina for managing functional constipation (FC) diagnosed via Rome IV criteria and TCM pattern differentiation (food stagnation with interior heat). Participants (n = 98 per group) received two 7-day treatment sessions separated by a 3-day interval. Outcomes — Bristol Stool Scale, defecation difficulty, stooling duration, stooling frequency, and abdominal bloating — were assessed at baseline, post-session one, post-session two, and one-week follow-up. Both interventions produced statistically significant improvements across all outcome measures versus baseline (P < .05), with gains maintained at follow-up. Han's style Tuina demonstrated superior outcomes compared to regular Tuina across all measures (P ≤ .01). No pharmacological co-interventions were described. Clinical takeaway: Pediatric Tuina, particularly Han's style, represents a viable, evidence-supported manual therapy adjunct for FC in children presenting with the food stagnation/interior heat pattern, warranting integration into pediatric TCM clinical protocols.
Browse our directory of verified licensed practitioners near you.
Find a practitioner →📌 Children with post-Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia who received TCM meridian massage three times weekly for one month achieved a lung function recovery rate of 88.8%, compared to just 41.9% in controls who received no massage therapy.
📌 A systematic review protocol has been registered to rigorously evaluate whether TCM-based and Western massage therapies safely and effectively improve cognitive outcomes — including attention, memory, and executive function — in individuals with autism spectrum disorder.
📌 Stroke patients receiving a TCM rehabilitation program combining Tuina, scalp acupuncture, and kinesiotherapy showed significantly greater improvements in limb spasticity, daily living activities, and quality of life compared to those receiving conventional rehabilitation alone (P<.05).